ChartingTheEconomy.Com

August 4, 2009

Worst 10 Performing Job Markets in the U.S. in the Past 12 Months

Filed under: Employment, Uncategorized, Worst Job Markets — admin @ 12:01 am

book2_9294_image002

The above chart is of the 10 worst job markets in the U.S as measured by the year-0ver-year change in the unemployment rate.  The measure is from June 2008 to June 2009.  For example, Bend, Oregon had an unemployment rate of 6.8% in June 2008, and in June 2009 had an unemployment rate of 14.8%.  So the year-over-year change in its unemployment rate is 8% (or 800 basis points).

Data source:

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

=================================================================================

July 3, 2009

Declaration of Independence

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 12:02 am

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.


The 56 signatures on the Declaration appear in the positions indicated:

Column 1
Georgia:
   Button Gwinnett
   Lyman Hall
   George Walton

Column 2
North Carolina:
   William Hooper
   Joseph Hewes
   John Penn
South Carolina:
   Edward Rutledge
   Thomas Heyward, Jr.
   Thomas Lynch, Jr.
   Arthur Middleton

Column 3
Massachusetts:
John Hancock
Maryland:
Samuel Chase
William Paca
Thomas Stone
Charles Carroll of Carrollton
Virginia:
George Wythe
Richard Henry Lee
Thomas Jefferson
Benjamin Harrison
Thomas Nelson, Jr.
Francis Lightfoot Lee
Carter Braxton

Column 4
Pennsylvania:
   Robert Morris
   Benjamin Rush
   Benjamin Franklin
   John Morton
   George Clymer
   James Smith
   George Taylor
   James Wilson
   George Ross
Delaware:
   Caesar Rodney
   George Read
   Thomas McKean

Column 5
New York:
   William Floyd
   Philip Livingston
   Francis Lewis
   Lewis Morris
New Jersey:
   Richard Stockton
   John Witherspoon
   Francis Hopkinson
   John Hart
   Abraham Clark

Column 6
New Hampshire:
   Josiah Bartlett
   William Whipple
Massachusetts:
   Samuel Adams
   John Adams
   Robert Treat Paine
   Elbridge Gerry
Rhode Island:
   Stephen Hopkins
   William Ellery
Connecticut:
   Roger Sherman
   Samuel Huntington
   William Williams
   Oliver Wolcott
New Hampshire:
   Matthew Thornton

Data source:

National Archives

April 23, 2009

New Housing Permits and Starts - How Low Can They Go?

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 12:02 am

book5_14520_image0021

homesw-cash_24946_image002

The first chart shows a historical view of the number of new houses permitted by month.  Seasonally adjusted, at an annual rate, new housing permits were 513,000 units.  This represents a record low reading.

The second chart shows a historical view of new housing starts.  Seasonally adjusted, at an annual rate, new housing starts for March 2009 were at 510,000 units.  This was the second lowest reading on record (Jan. 2009 was slightly lower at 488,000 units).  March new housing starts were down sharply from February by 62,000 units.

The first thing I notice from the above charts is that, historically, housing permits and starts are volatile.  The boom and bust of past housing cycles is also apparent.  Furthermore, these charts give some historical perspective on the depth of the current housing crisis.

Check in tomorrow for a chart on new housing unit completions.  New housing sales data is also released tomorrow, and I will try to to get something out on that too.  It will be interesting to see recent data on units completed compared to units sold (given that inventories are already extremely high). 

Data Source:

U.S. Census Bureau

================================================================================

February 21, 2009

Unemployment Shows Housing has Farther to Fall

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 6:03 pm

A new paper on unemployment and housing has just been published.  You can find it under the “Pages” section in the upper righthand section of this page.

March 10, 2005

The U.S. Current Account Deficit: Is Our Economic Health in Foreign Hands?

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 10:06 am

The U.S. Current Account Deficit:  Is Our Economic Health in Foreign Hands?

March 2005

By: ChartingTheEconomy.Com

We got a glimpse the other day of just how vulnerable the markets may be to the massive current account imbalance
that the U.S. is running with the rest of the world.  It was reported that South Korea was seeking to diversify its official
reserves out of the U.S. dollar (dollar).  On the same day the Dow was down over 174, the dollar fell sharply, bonds
dropped, the options market’s short-term risk forecast had its biggest one-day rise since July, and gold was up
sharply.  Not all of this can be directly attributed to the news about South Korea.  Oil was also up sharply (to over $51
per barrel) on the same day which helped spook the markets.  However, it was no coincidence that the markets
behaved the way they did on the same day that news about South Korea’s plan to diversify their dollar holdings was
reported.  The next day it was reported that South Korea was not going to start selling dollars after all.  Time will tell.
This incident, however, gave us a view of what may be to come if the U.S. cannot reduce its current account deficit.
The U.S. current account deficit is the broad measure of the U.S.’s global trade imbalance.  In addition to trade in
goods and services it includes certain financial transfers.  There are multiple factors that have helped cause the
imbalance that we face today.  However, the two most commonly identified causes are that the U.S. would rather
consume, than save, while that the rest of the world would rather do the opposite.  In fact, personal savings as a
percent of personal disposable income has been on a steady decline in the U.S. for the past 20 years from a level of
near 11% in 1984.  The national savings rate for 2004 was just over one percent of disposable income which is the
lowest it has been since the great depression.  As the savings rate in the U.S. has declined, Americans have steadily
increased their level of consumption.  As a result, consumer expenditures now make up roughly 70% of gross domestic
product.

We all know that much of what we purchase is foreign made – look around your home.  Just about all of our current
account imbalance is made up of the trade deficit between the U.S. and the world.  In turn, the U.S. trade deficit is
caused entirely by our massive negative imbalance in the export/import of goods.  The U.S. actually has a positive
balance in the trade of services.  Accordingly, it is our ever increasing purchase of foreign goods, and the fact that
foreign nations are not reciprocating in their purchase of U.S. goods, that fuels our current account deficit.

Chart #1 shows how the annual U.S. current account deficit has grown.  In 2004 the trade deficit was negative $617.7B
which represents most of the current account deficit.

ca1

The Current Account Deficit – Low Interest Rates

As we just discussed, the fact that Americans are consumers and many foreigners are savers has a material affect on
the U.S. current account deficit.  To a large degree this is a cultural difference that may be slow to change, if ever.
There are other reasons from cheap foreign labor to unfair trade practices that also add to the deficit.  For now let’s
focus on two things.  First, the low interest rates in the U.S., and second, the artificially high dollar versus major Asian
currencies.

The low interest rates of the past several years may have helped stave off a recession, but they may also have added
to the current account deficit.  Knowing that consumer spending makes up over two-thirds of the U.S. GDP, the Federal
Reserve cut interest rates to historically low levels in the past several years.  The upside was a quick return to growth
for the U.S. economy by spurring spending.  However, the downside was a reduced incentive for Americans to save.
The last couple of years we have had negative real interest rates (interest rates minus inflation), a very rare
occurrence.  In this environment, it can be argued that spending is the best thing to do with your money.  Why, because
many short-term guaranteed investments would actually lose money after inflation when there are negative real interest
rates.  Also, with the cost of borrowing so low, buying on credit is much more appealing.  So, the low interest rates have
kept the economy growing but have also helped increase the U.S. current account deficit.

Low interest rates did help weaken the dollar.  Even so, the current account imbalance has continued to grow.  Now,
with interest rates on the rise, in theory the dollar should begin to strengthen.  The problem is the dollar is still artificially
strong against major Asian currencies, and even with increasing interest rates the dollar may be slow to strengthen and
even continue to decline.

The Current Account Deficit – Artificially High Dollar

You would think that with the sharp fall in the dollar in recent years the current account deficit would begin to reverse.
Not yet.  One of the biggest reasons is that China and Japan have kept their currencies artificially weak compared to
the dollar.  The reason for this is simple, to support their exports to the U.S. China has not allowing its currency, the
renminbi, to float versus the dollar.  As the dollar has declined in value against most other foreign currencies, it has not
declined against the renminbi which many believe is now very under valued. In the case of Japan, it has been buying
massive amounts of U.S. treasuries with the dollars they receive from their trade surplus with the U.S.  The result is a
stronger Japanese yen versus the dollar because they are not selling the dollars they receive on the foreign exchange
market.  The bottom line is both China and Japan have been supporting their exports by keeping their currencies weak
against the dollar.  These are leading causes of the increasing current account deficit.

What are Foreign Countries Doing with Their U.S. Dollars?

Americans get foreign goods, and foreigners get our dollars in return.  What they do with these dollars is up to them.
They can either sell them on the foreign exchange – converting them into other currencies, or they can invest them in
the U.S. Up until now foreign countries have mainly been doing the later.  One of the favorite U.S. investment
instruments of foreigners has been U.S. Treasuries (U.S. Federal Government debt).  Chart # 2 shows how foreign
ownership of U.S. treasuries has increased in recent years.

ca21

Chart #3 shows the picture another way.  Foreign ownership of the U.S. Government debt as a percent of the total
outstanding debt held by the public has grown sharply in the past several years.  Foreign ownership as of December
2004 was nearing 45% of the total.

ca3

As seen in Chart #2, in just the past four years the amount of U.S. treasury securities held by foreigners has almost
doubled from just over $1 Trillion to just under $2 Trillion.  It is hard to even visualize just how large these numbers
are.  To put this into perspective, let’s convert these numbers to a level that is more meaningful, a per household
number.  Chart #4 shows the household share of U.S. Federal Government debt held by foreigners.  If the U.S.
Government paid off the debt held by foreigners today, every household in America would need to come up with almost
$17,000.

ca4

Of course this is not going to happen, but it helps give perspective.  The good news is that foreigners see the U.S. as a
good investment, so they are willing to hold large sums of U.S. debt.  If they did not, they would be selling the dollars we
send them on the foreign exchange markets.  If that were to happen, what we saw in the markets the other day after the
news from South Korea would be small by comparison.

What Countries Own Our Debt?

It is in no country’s best interest to see a collapse in the dollar.  If this happened, there could easily be a global
economic slump.  However, at some point foreign countries, like any reasonable investors, start to see diversification as
prudent.  The question is when and to what level?  In some respects it is already happening. Russia in November 2004
said it might start increasing the amount of euros it holds.  Japan’s holding of U.S. treasuries actually peaked in August
2004 and has declined slightly through December 2004.  The recent news out of South Korea also shows just how
nervous some countries are becoming.

It should also be noted that Alan Greenspan recently has begun to caution that foreign countries may seek to diversify
their dollar denominated assets.  At the European Banking Congress in Frankfurt Germany in November 2004
Greenspan stated:  “It seems persuasive that, given the size of the U.S. current account deficit, a diminished appetite
for adding to dollar balances must occur at some point.  But when, through what channels, and from what level of the
dollar?  Regrettably, no answer to those questions is convincing.  This is a reason that forecasting the exchange rate for
the dollar and other major currencies is problematic.”  So, even Greenspan points out that it is extremely difficult to
know what will finally cause foreigners to begin selling U.S. dollars and to what degree they will act.  However, he is
growing cautious.

Chart #5 shows the major foreign holders of U.S. treasury securities as of December 2004 and the amount each
country holds.

ca5

An Example of How Demand for Securities Can Change

Chart #6 shows annual net foreign purchases of U.S. Treasury Bonds & Notes since 1990.  The massive accumulation
of these assets by foreigners in the past several years is obvious.  What is of equal interest is that after the last peak in
foreign purchases in 1996 how quickly the demand slowed in the following years.  This is a good example of how
quickly foreign demand for U.S. assets can change.

ca6

Why Should We Be Concerned About the Current Account Deficit?

By running the massive current account deficits of the past several years, we are putting an increasing amount of
control over our economic wellbeing in foreign hands.  As we saw with the news about South Korea the other day, just
talk of a foreign country diversifying their dollar holdings can add high volatility to markets.  If we do not begin reducing
our account imbalance, there will come a time when foreigners become less willing to hold dollar denominated assets.
When this happens, the U.S. will be forced to increase interest rates (maybe sharply) to continue to attract foreign
investment.  If the account imbalance continues to grow, higher interest rates could be just a small part of the story.
What happens if foreign countries panic? That is the real problem.

If a few foreign countries begin to diversify their dollar holdings, it might start a rush to follow suit.  In this worst case
scenario, as nations sell their dollar holdings the dollar begins to decline even further.  Other nations begin seeing their
dollar denominated holdings being devalued and begin to sell.  With few buyers, the dollar falls sharply and interest
rates rise rapidly.  The falling dollar causes imports to become more expensive, inflation spikes, and gold prices soar.
This is not a pretty picture for most.  While many would argue that this scenario is not likely, we should not write it off.
The reality is that this scenario becomes more likely as the current account deficit grows.  The larger problem is that we
have less control over our own economic wellbeing.

Where Do We Go From Here?

Predicting the future direction of the current account imbalance is extremely difficult primarily because so much of it
depends on currency exchange rates, and the currency market is very difficult to forecast.  What is clear is that the U.S.
needs to turn the tide on the rising current account deficit quickly.  As stated earlier, increases in interest rates are
needed to get Americans saving again.  While rising interest rates usually help strengthen the dollar, this time it may
not. This is not necessarily a bad thing.  A further decline in the dollar, at a controlled pace, will help reduce the
current account deficit.  In fact, the U.S. should continue to pressure China to let their currency float against the dollar.
This will lead to a rise in import prices.  However, the positive side is more U.S. exports to China and more balanced
trade.
The U.S. also needs to reduce its massive federal budget deficit.  Reducing the budget deficit should help increase
domestic savings. At the European Banking Congress in Frankfurt Germany in November 2004 Chairman Greenspan
stated “Reducing the federal deficit (or preferably moving it to surplus) appears to be the most effective action that
could be taken to augment domestic saving.  Significantly increasing private saving in the United States–more
particularly, finding policies that would elevate the personal saving rate from its current extraordinarily low level–of
course would also be helpful.”

Conclusion

The U.S. needs to turn the tide on its rising current account deficit quickly.  It is becoming clear that foreign
governments are beginning to see a need for diversification of their holdings in U.S. securities.  Recent news that South
Korea was going to diversify their dollar reserves showed us how uncomfortable some nations are becoming with their
large holdings in dollars.  It also showed us just how susceptible major markets have become to the U.S. current
account deficit as markets were very volatile after the news.  It was also a reminder of just how much control foreign
governments that own our debt have over the markets and potentially over our economy.

While rising interest rates may cause Americans to begin saving more and consuming less, more is needed to reverse
the current account imbalance.  A weakening dollar so far has done little to slow the increasing U.S. current account
imbalance, let alone reverse it.  What this suggests is that a further weakening in the dollar is likely, especially against
major Asian currencies.  Without this it is hard to see how the U.S. current account can be brought back into balance.

Sources

Chart #1:  Data is from The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). U.S. international transactions historical data and 3rd
quarter 2004 report.  The 2004 number is an estimate using current account data for the first three quarters of 2004
and trade data for all of 2004.

Chart #2:  Data is from The U.S. Treasury Department. Treasury International Capital System (TIC).

Chart #3:  U.S. Treasury Department. Treasury International Capital System and Bureau of the Public Debt.

Chart #4:  U.S. Treasury Department. Data on number of households is from the Census Bureau. For 2004 the
number of households is estimated.

Chart #5:  U.S. Treasury Department. TIC. Caribbean Banking Centers include Bahamas, Bermuda, Cayman Islands,
Netherlands Antilles, and Panama.

Chart #6:  U.S. Treasury Department. TIC

Powered by WordPress